Brian's Dream Diary - Over 8,000 documented dreams, many of which have already come true :: || Brian Ladd specializes in dream analyzation, dream prediction, remote viewing and more with thousands of documents dreams...the largest personal online dream diary in the world. Brian does not claim to be psychic, he insists we all can predict the future using our dreams, and much, much more.

As of Friday, September 08, 2006 20:13:39 -0400 this is what we have on this specific dream drawing prediction. If your able to help provide proof or information on this specific drawing, please click here to send me an email. You will receive full credit for your find, to include reward monies. Please include the exact date of the dream and the DD number. And again, thank you for your time, its very much appreciated.

There are many secret hidden on a hard dive, that if the public found out, President Bush (US) and many people that work close to him could be charge with "War Crimes". The evidence on the drive could even be used in a criminal case that will recommend the death sentence to the president and several members of his staff. Also, the location of this drive is above, and I'm sorry again for not knowing any more details.

Brian & all,
I am neither of any political party. I am a free spirited thinker of truth. Give & take what you desire in the following research that I conducted. In this time of great need we shall all find emptyness untill we all open our eyes & do what's right for humanity.

7/29/2005
DD991

... Could Bush administration officials be prosecuted for 'war crimes ... President Bush on tough new measures of handling prisoners could leave U.S. officials vulnerable to charges of war crimes ... Bush appointees were in charge ...

... uranium could cause ... power of the president to declare anyone, including U.S. citizens, without charge ... President Bush is trying to pardon himself. Here’s the deal: Under the War Crimes Act ...

... President Bush guilty of war crimes ... could have far-reaching implications. At issue is President Bush's powers to create war crimes ... war crimes, the president of the United States points the finger at others. Any suggestion that Bush should face such a charge ... http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0404-33.htm

... said, “the first one to be given the most severe sentence this planet has to offer should be the president of ... 8 Responses to “Hugo Chavez states President Bush should get the death penalty for ...

From corporate crimes to murder in Iraq. Crimes of the Bush dynasty ... To paraphrase Karl Marx, the Bushes truly came to us dripping from ... He made his fortune as a war profiteer, working alongside the ...

... Crimes and Crimes Against ... in crimes against humanity pursuant to the post-9/11 activities of the United States, both domestically and internationally: President George W. Bush; ... has been proven ...

Memos Reveal War Crimes Warnings

Could Bush administration officials be prosecuted for 'war crimes' as a result of new measures used in the war on terror? The White House's top lawyer thought so

WEB EXCLUSIVE

By Michael Isikoff

Newsweek

Updated: 9:14 a.m. ET May 19, 2004

May 17 - The White House's top lawyer warned more than two years ago that U.S. officials could be prosecuted for "war crimes" as a result of new and unorthodox measures used by the Bush administration in the war on terrorism, according to an internal White House memo and interviews with participants in the debate over the issue.

The concern about possible future prosecution for war crimes—and that it might even apply to Bush adminstration officials themselves— is contained in a crucial portion of an internal January 25, 2002, memo by White House counsel Alberto Gonzales obtained by NEWSWEEK. It urges President George Bush declare the war in Afghanistan, including the detention of Taliban and Al Qaeda fighters, exempt from the provisions of the Geneva Convention.

In the memo, the White House lawyer focused on a little known 1996 law passed by Congress, known as the War Crimes Act, that banned any Americans from committing war crimes—defined in part as "grave breaches" of the Geneva Conventions. Noting that the law applies to "U.S. officials" and that punishments for violators "include the death penalty," Gonzales told Bush that "it was difficult to predict with confidence" how Justice Department prosecutors might apply the law in the future. This was especially the case given that some of the language in the Geneva Conventions—such as that outlawing "outrages upon personal dignity" and "inhuman treatment" of prisoners—was "undefined."

Story continues below ↓

One key advantage of declaring that Taliban and Al Qaeda fighters did not have Geneva Convention protections is that it "substantially reduces the threat of domestic criminal prosecution under the War Crimes Act," Gonzales wrote."It is difficult to predict the motives of prosecutors and independent counsels who may in the future decide to pursue unwarranted charges based on Section 2441 [the War Crimes Act]," Gonzales wrote.

The best way to guard against such "unwarranted charges," the White House lawyer concluded, would be for President Bush to stick to his decision—then being strongly challenged by Secretary of State Powell— to exempt the treatment of captured Al Qaeda and Taliban fighters from Geneva convention provisions.

"Your determination would create a reasonable basis in law that (the War Crimes Act) does not apply which would provide a solid defense to any future prosecution," Gonzales wrote.

The memo—and strong dissents by Secretary of State Colin Powell and his chief legal advisor, William Howard Taft IV—are among hundreds of pages of internal administration documents on the Geneva Convention and related issues that have been obtained by NEWSWEEK and are reported for the first time in this week's magazine. Newsweek made some of them available online today.

The memos provide fresh insights into a fierce internal administration debate over whether the United States should conform to international treaty obligations in pursuing the war on terror. Administration critics have charged that key legal decisions made in the months after September 11, 2001 including the White House's February 2002 declaration not to grant any Al Qaeda and Taliban fighters prisoners of war status under the Geneva Convention, laid the groundwork for the interrogation abuses that have recently been revealed in the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.

As reported in this week's magazine edition, the Gonzales memo urged Bush to declare all aspects of the war in Afghanistan—including the detention of both Al Qaeda and Taliban fighters—exempt from the strictures of the Geneva Convention. In the memo, Gonzales described the war against terorrism as a "new kind of war" and then added: "The nature of the new war places a high premium on other factors, such as the ability to quickly obtain information from captured terrorists and their sponsors in order to avoid further atrocities against American civilians, and the need to try terrorists for war crimes such as wantonly killing civilians."

But while top White House officials publicly talked about trying Al Qaeda leaders for war crimes, the internal memos show that administration lawyers were privately concerned that they could tried for war crimes themselves based on actions the administration were taking, and might have to take in the future, to combat the terrorist threat.

The issue first arises in a January 9, 2002, draft memorandum written by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) concluding that "neither the War Crimes Act nor the Geneva Conventions" would apply to the detention conditions of Al Qaeda or Taliban prisoners at Guantanamo Bay Cuba. The memo includes a lengthy discussion of the War Crimes Act, which it concludes has no binding effect on the president because it would interfere with his Commander in Chief powers to determine "how best to deploy troops in the field." (The memo, by Justice lawyers John Yoo and Robert Delahunty, also concludes—in response to a question by the Pentagon—that U.S. soldiers could not be tried for violations of the laws of war in Afghanistan because such international laws have "no binding legal effect on either the President or the military.")

But while the discussion in the Justice memo revolves around the possible application of the War Crimes Act to members of the U.S. military, there is some reason to believe that administration lawyers were worried that the law could even be used in the future against senior administration officials.

One lawyer involved in the interagency debates over the Geneva Conventions issue recalled a meeting in early 2002 in which participants challenged Yoo, a primary architect of the administration's legal strategy, when he raised the possibility of Justice Department war crimes prosecutions unless there was a clear presidential direction proclaiming the Geneva Conventions did not apply to the war in Afghanistan. The concern seemed misplaced, Yoo was told, given that loyal Bush appointees were in charge of the Justice Department.

"Well, the political climate could change," Yoo replied, according to the lawyer who attended the meeting. "The implication was that a new president would come into office and start potential prosecutions of a bunch of ex-Bush officials," the lawyer said. (Yoo declined comment.)

This appears to be precisely the concern in Gonzales's memo dated January 25, 2002, in which he strongly urges Bush to stick to his decision to exempt the treatment of Taliban and Al Qaeda fighters from the provisons of the Geneva Conventions. (Powell and the State Department had wanted the U.S. to at least have individual reviews of Taliban fighters before concluding that they did not qualify for Geneva Convention provisions.)

One reason to do so, Gonzales wrote, is that it "substantially reduces the threat of domestic criminal prosecution under the War Crimes Act." He added that "it is difficult to predict with confidence what actions might be deemed to constitute violations" of the War Crimes Act just as it was "difficult to predict the needs and circumstances that could arise in the course of the war on terrorism." Such uncertainties, Gonzales wrote, argued for the President to uphold his exclusion of Geneva Convention provisions to the Taliban and Al Qaeda detainees who, he concluded, would still be treated "humanely and, to the extent appropriate and consistent with military necessarity, in a manner consistst with the principles" of the Geneva Convention on the treatment of prisoners of war.

In the end, after strong protests from Powell, the White House retreated slightly. In February 2002, it proclaimed that, while the United States would adhere to the Geneva Conventions in the conduct of the war in Afghanistan, captured Taliban and Qaeda fighters would not be given prisoner of war status under the conventions. It is a rendering that Administration lawyers believed would protect U.S. interrogators or their superiors in Washington from being subjected to prosecutions under the War Crimes Act based on their treatment of the prisoners.

Hugo Chavez states President Bush should get the death penalty for stageing 9/11 attacks

With the new Progressive Democrat takeover of Congress, and Nancy Pelosi as the Speaker of the House, Hugo Chavez is bolder with his attacks on Bush. Maybe Citgo doesn’t have to worry about a Citgo Boycott. The U.S. and Venezuela share very similar political ruling parties.
Carlos “The Jackal” is pen pals with Hugo Chavez.

Hugo Chavez and Carlos the Jackal

And here is a message from “Mike.”

Chavez attacks Bush as a ‘genocidal’ leader
Venezuela’s president continued his criticism of President Bush after the pro-Ch�vez legislature declared that the 9/11 attacks were `self-inflicted.’
BY PHIL GUNSON
Special to The Miami Herald

When Venezuela’s leftist President Hugo Ch�vez called President Bush ”el diablo” in a U.N. speech in September, many thought his ”anti-imperialist” rhetoric had reached rock bottom.

But not so from the fat-faced thug. The Venezuelan government, to judge from recent events, officially regards Bush as a genocidal Nazi who arranged the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks to justify aggression against other nations.

In a speech Tuesday, Ch�vez criticized the decision of an Iraqi court to sentence former dictator Saddam Hussein to the death penalty. ”If sentencing is to be done,” Ch�vez said, “the first one to be given the most severe sentence this planet has to offer should be the president of the United States, if we’re talking about genocidal presidents.”

HUGO’s RESOLUTION ON 9/11

His comments, which were fairly typical of his recent attacks on Bush, came shortly after the publication of a resolution by Venezuela’s legislative National Assembly describing the 9/11 attacks as ‘’self-inflicted” and after an exhibition at the Foreign Ministry building in Caracas in which Bush was portrayed as a Nazi storm trooper.

(Ironically, Chavez and his friends in high places are ex-storm troopers who tried to take control of Venezuela’s government by the point of their guns).

The resolution, which just appeared in the official government gazette, (like the New York Times is the government gazette for the Democrat party) primarily criticized Washington’s decision to build a wall along the Mexican border to keep illegal immigrants out.

It calls on the U.S. Congress to “demand that the government of President Bush explain the self-inflicted attack on the World Trade Center and its victims, the supposed aircraft that crashed into the Pentagon and the links between the bin Laden family and the Bush family.”

The resolution, drafted by Carlos Escarr� was passed unanimously by the 167-member assembly, all of them Ch�vez supporters after the opposition boycott of fixed elections last December.

Both Ch�vez and Foreign Minister Nicol�s Maduro have referred several times in the past to suspicions that the 9/11 attacks were planned by the Bush administration, and have called for an inquiry.

Maybe Nancy Pelosi, or John Murtha can help Chavez out.

Why didn’t you read this in your mainstream media? Could it be that the union activists and liberal/progressive jounalists want to keep their shared hate for free enterprise and Republicans?

This entry was posted on Thursday, November 9th, 2006 at 9:04 pm and is filed under PR, President Bush, oil, mainstream news media, Biodiesel, old media, Hugo Chavez, Newspapers/Magazines, newspaper business, Rush Limbaugh, 2nd ammendment, Nancy Pelosi, Michael Savage, Sean Hannity, Marxist. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site

dream diary navigation

For the lasted information on my dreams, please visit my Dream Forum here, or see below for the very latest posts.

all dreams - dreams this year - this month - this week - last night - top 10 - correct - thumbnails - dream forum - dream cures - dreams about you - tell-a-friend

Additional Site Information and Links

Click below to view my nightly Missing Persons TV Show and Dream Talk with Brian Ladd and Debra Brink - Click here to access my Dream Forum now.

Missing Person's TV Show Feed | Missing Person's Radio Feed

View all my TV Shows here

Site Links

Home - Sharing Hope News - Become a Member - Subliminal Store - Natural Cures and Home Remedies CD Collection - More About Me - Video Chat Rooms - Video Archives - Critics - Dream Forum - Radio - Blog Talk - MySpace - Facebook - Site News - Popular Dreams that have come true - Verified / Correct Dreams - Last night's dreams - Dreams this month - Dreams archives - Dream Thumbnails - Missing Persons Section - Missing Person Forum - Missing Persons Radio - Missing Person's TV - Missing Database - Domains - Remote/Brian/Dream Viewing - Edgar Cayce - COA Forum - Free dream newsletter - Contact me - Invention dreams - Spread the word - Reader's letters and comments - Request a dream/pillow viewing - Proof of God and the Human Soul - Secrets - Dream Cures - FBI's Most Wanted - Help Wanted - Gale St. John - Sitemap - Video RSS Feed - Swine Flu (H1N1) Forum - FindJessie.com - FindAdji.com - FindCindy.com - ClearTVNetwork.com - JusticeforRobert - JusticeForHaleigh.com - www.FindGabriel.com - Angels are Missing Website - E.S.P.I. TV - www.PsychicNetwork.tv - Stickam - Site Map 2 3 - wiki docs - XML link s